<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SNBlogs Full Nelson - Latest Comments in 6th District fundraising numbers a surprise</title><link>http://snblogs-fullnelson.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://snblogs-fullnelson.disqus.com/6th_district_fundraising_numbers_a_surprise/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:26:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 6th District fundraising numbers a surprise</title><link>http://blogs.salemnews.com/fullnelson/2009/10/19/6th-district-fundraising-numbers-a-surprise/#comment-20779500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nelson: by my math, Hudak raised $45,527 and Tierney $153,470 in the period.  That's better than three to one.  How can you count Hudak's own out of pocket spending on his own campaign as evidence of fundraising prowess?  This reads like you just copied and pasted a Hudak propaganda release.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Think Before You Write</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:26:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6th District fundraising numbers a surprise</title><link>http://blogs.salemnews.com/fullnelson/2009/10/19/6th-district-fundraising-numbers-a-surprise/#comment-20605839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We deserve our empty suit to be re-elected&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David_Pelletier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:45:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>