<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SNBlogs Full Nelson - Latest Comments in Bad blood in Beverly</title><link>http://snblogs-fullnelson.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://snblogs-fullnelson.disqus.com/bad_blood_in_beverly/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:03:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bad blood in Beverly</title><link>http://blogs.salemnews.com/fullnelson/2009/10/14/bad-blood-in-beverly/#comment-21028831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hitman i don't see anybody from the SNEWS endorsing burke. Like benton doe's for scanlon. And we all no that's true !!!! As far as bias goes i think you HIT YOUR HEAD.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">allseeingeye</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:03:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad blood in Beverly</title><link>http://blogs.salemnews.com/fullnelson/2009/10/14/bad-blood-in-beverly/#comment-20262702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;THEN, RUN FOR OFFICE &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:09:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad blood in Beverly</title><link>http://blogs.salemnews.com/fullnelson/2009/10/14/bad-blood-in-beverly/#comment-20191881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr Benton - The last time Scanlon lost an election in an upset, it was to Crean largely because of the bid rigging scandal at the Beverly Golf Club. It is now late October, and we do not have a committed operator for Beverly Golf for next year. Maybe, Mr Benton, you could inquire what is really happening at the Beverly Golf Club ----- and ask some probing questions, like Is the City being paid?  Why isn't there an extension yet?  Is the City preparing to put it out to bid again? Why?  The City approved $1,600,000 for the Club over a year ago because the Mayor was in breach of his contract.  Why hasn't any of this money (except a pittance) been spent yet - a year after the fact despite the fact that the City's Finance Director said in October 2008 that the City HAD to invest this long overdue money in the city's most valuable revenue producing asset?  If the City does not have an operator next year, could it cost the City $1,000,000 in annual cash flow?With all your investigative resources, I am sure one could find out what is happening with the City's most important asset ..... just a thought in case you wanted to actualy get your hands dirty and do some reporting on issues facing the City&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mattpaul</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:29:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad blood in Beverly</title><link>http://blogs.salemnews.com/fullnelson/2009/10/14/bad-blood-in-beverly/#comment-20146652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As I look at all the political signage littering our neighborhoods, I am disappointed to see all the same names as in past elections.  This "good old boy" network is so entrenched in Beverly government that we have no right to expect any new ideas or any changes from the status quo.  What we need is a mayor and city council who will stand up to the unions who have gotten more or less everything they have demanded and are costing the city way more money than they are worth.  What we need is an outsider who isn't cozy with the city council and the unions and who is the smartest person in the room.  That's not what we will be getting with Burke or Scanlon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fed up in the Cove</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:47:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad blood in Beverly</title><link>http://blogs.salemnews.com/fullnelson/2009/10/14/bad-blood-in-beverly/#comment-20138158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wondered about that myself.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">baileyadams</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:09:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad blood in Beverly</title><link>http://blogs.salemnews.com/fullnelson/2009/10/14/bad-blood-in-beverly/#comment-20122328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Out of curiosity, did Burke receive permission from the SNEWS or Paul Leighton for using their name and his picture on his web site?  It is used in a way that seems to imply that Leighton supports Burke...in which case I hope the SNEWS limits his ability to cover the campaign due to bias.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hitman_01915</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:16:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad blood in Beverly</title><link>http://blogs.salemnews.com/fullnelson/2009/10/14/bad-blood-in-beverly/#comment-20060698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Frankly, neither candidate has that much going for them.  Burke has a history of ugly anonymous letters that he only admited to after he stupidly left the evidence of his authorship in city hall!  Scanlon has certainly not been the great manager that he would have us all believe he is.  Just look at the golf course fiasco, he has cost the city a bundle on that one alone, and he has a reputation for vindictiveness. So frankly neither of them is the best candidate for the position of mayor.  I don't know who would be, but the qualifications I'm looking for are; 1)honesty, personal and professional, 2) Business experience, expecially in this economy this is essential, 3) the ability to work well with the city council and the school board.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mackerelcove</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:11:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>